Side Effect: Liver Failure (hepatitis, acute liver failure, liver transplant)

February 2008 "Dear Doctor" Letter About Avelox / Avalox Is Sent By Bayer In Europe

Action Reportedly Intended To Emphasize 2007 Label Change About Severe, Possibly Fatal Liver And Skin Side Effects

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

A February 14, 2008 Reuters article, "Bayer warns doctors on rare Avelox side effects", reports that this German drug company is sending warning letters to doctors in Europe about the antibiotic Avelox, one of its top-selling drugs. This February 2008 letter -- which would be generally referred to as a "Dear Doctor" letter -- is reportedly intended to emphasize severe liver reactions and serious skin rashes that can be caused by Avelox use.

From the February 14 Reuters article about this Avelox letter from Bayer:

Bayer has included the additional warnings in the packaging of Avelox products since autumn last year after some incidents of severe side effects were monitored, but is now reinforcing this by writing to doctors.

"The side effects are very rare. But when it happens, it is quite severe to patients. We want doctors to be more aware," said Yvonne Moeller, a spokeswoman at Bayer.

Avelox, or Avalox in Europe, is used by patients as treatment for respiratory and other infections.

Some additional details about this development were provided by a Thomson Financial News article, "Avelox: Bayer warns of liver damage risk linked to Avelox antibiotic, changes label", also from February 14:

Bayer AG (NYSE:BAY) has warned doctors that its Avelox antibiotic may lead to potentially fatal liver damage and skin disease in rare cases, following a routine analysis of recent data on side effects.

The link between Avelox and the side effects has been known but the analysis has yielded very rare new cases, prompting the German drug maker to adjust the labelling of Avelox and informing doctors, a Bayer spokeswoman said, confirming a report in Dutch newspaper Algemeen Dagblad.

We will watch for any similar Avelox "Dear Doctor" letter from Bayer here in the U.S.

Oral Anti-Fungal Lamisil Associated With Liver Failure And Other Hepatic Adverse Reactions

February 2008 Australian Report Links Liver Failure And Hepatitis To Popular Novartis Drug

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

A February 4, 2008 article, "Anti-fungal tablet linked to liver deaths", published by Australia's Herald Sun newspaper, brought to our attention the fact that Australian drug regulators have issued a warning about serious liver reactions after taking a popular prescription drug used to treat fungal infections, Lamisil (terbinafine), which is made by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (NVS).

We get an overview of this Australian regulatory report from the February 4 Herald Sun article:

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has issued a warning about serious adverse side effects reported with oral Lamisil, a pill formulation for ringworm and nail fungal problems.

The medication is commonly prescribed to people who do not respond to topical fungal creams, but the regulator's Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (ADRAC) warns it can cause liver failure.

The committee has received 722 adverse event reports related to Lamisil, known generically as terbinafine, including 70 liver reactions, 61 implicating the tablet form as the sole suspected drug.

Those affected ranged from 20 to 85 years old, with half suffering their liver reaction within the first month of taking the pills.

For more details, we take this excerpt from the ADRAC report about Lamisil, "Hepatic reactions with terbinafine", which appeared in the February 2008 Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletin (Volume 27, Number 1):

Of the total 722 adverse event reports received up to January 2008 in connection with terbinafine (all dose forms), 70 describe hepatic reactions and most (61) implicated oral terbinafine as the sole suspected drug. Onychomycosis was the most commonly cited reason for use of terbinafine; patient age ranged from 20 to 85 (median 58) years, and men and women were affected equally. Half of the reports documented onset of hepatic reaction within the first month and 80% within 7 weeks. Most of the reports document minor abnormalities of liver function but 3 describe fatal liver failure, 10 describe hepatitis, and 12 describe jaundice. Full recovery was noted in 27 reports but 34 cases had not recovered and the outcome remained unknown in 9.

This same report pointed out that "ADRAC has previously drawn attention to serious adverse reactions associated with orally administered terbinafine", specifically:

Returning to the the Herald Sun article for a report of the response from Novartis:

A spokesman for the drug's manufacturer, Novartis, said that serious and life-threatening liver reactions were rare and well documented side-effects of oral anti-fungal medications.

The company said it agreed with the advice issued by ADRAC.

In the November 2005 package insert for Lamisil, under the WARNINGS section, one finds the statement "Rare cases of liver failure, some leading to death or liver transplant, have occurred...."  There is a similar mention in the ADVERSE REACTIONS section of the current Lamisil package insert, or label.

We'll watch to see whether this regulatory alert about serious liver side effects prompts any Lamisil label change by Novartis in Australia, at least.

Debate Over Whether Zetia And Vytorin Are, In Fact, Effective Overshadows The Side Effects Of These Drugs

Ezetimibe Component Of These Drugs Is Associated With Liver Failure, Acute Pancreatitis, Rhabdomyolysis, and Thrombocytopenia

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

Ezetimibe is used alone (i.e., Zetia) or in combination with other antilipemic agents such as a statin or fenofibrate.  In some instances, ezetimibe is in fixed combination with simvastatin (i.e., Vytorin).

Zetia and Vytorin are prescribed as an adjunct to dietary therapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia, as well as homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and/or homozygous familial sitosterolemia.  As is relatively well-known by now, however, the efficacy of Zetia and Vytorin was called into question when the results of the ENHANCE clinical study were finally released in January 2008 by Merck and Schering-Plough.

For some recent developments concerning the ENHANCE study controversy as well as the related issue of whether Zetia and Vytorin are effective treatments, we refer you to these two leading sources of information:

"Early Communication about an Ongoing Data Review for Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (marketed as Vytorin), Ezetimibe (marketed as Zetia), and Simvastatin (marketed as Zocor)", which was issued by the FDA on January 25, 2008; and,

"Merck and Schering-Plough Respond To Issues Raised About ENHANCE Clinical Trial", a January 25, 2008 press release that these two drug companies managed to get out in advance of the FDA alerting the public about its Early Communication item concerning Zetia and Vytorin later that day.  This press release includes a link to an an ENHANCE Chronology (PDF format) prepared by Merck and/or Schering-Plough which is seemingly intended to reinforce the claims made in their press release.

Moving to the drug-safety aspect, there have been reports of Zetia and Vytorin causing some serious side effects, such as:

  • drug-induced hepatitis;
  • liver failure;
  • acute pancreatitis;
  • rhabdomyolysis; and,
  • thrombocytopenia.

On February 6, 2008 we received The Annals Online Articles Ahead of Print Alert about a new article concerning a Vytorin adverse drug reaction report that was published online by The Annals of Pharmacotherapy before this article's scheduled publication in its March edition.  The Abstract for "Ezetimibe-Associated Immune Thrombocytopenia", this March 2008 medical journal article about Vytorin, provides these basic facts:

  • OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of immune thrombocytopenia associated with treatment with ezetimibe, a cholesterol absorption inhibitor.
  • CASE SUMMARY: A 72-year-old man presented with severe thrombocytopenia (platelets 3 x 103/µL) and "wet purpura" 4 weeks after being started on daily therapy using a combination of ezetimibe 10 mg/simvastatin 20 mg. Platelet counts normalized after administration of ezetimibe/ simvastatin was stopped. Nine months later, the patient was restarted on simvastatin because of uncorrected dyslipidemia. Platelet counts remained within the normal range following that rechallenge.
  • DISCUSSION: Registry data revealed the possibility of ezetimibe-induced thrombocytopenia, but, as of December 3, 2007, no other case reports on this interaction had been published. This case illustrates the probable occurrence of ezetimibe-induced thrombocytopenia. Platelet counts dropped significantly when ezetimibe therapy was initiated, then resolved upon discontinuation of therapy. Other causes of thrombocytopenia were ruled out, and rechallenge with simvastatin further supports the presence of a causal relationship between thrombocytopenia and ezetimibe....
  • CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe-associated thrombocytopenia cannot be ruled out in the patient reported here. Clinicians should be aware of this adverse event.

We will continue to watch for drug-injury reports concerning Vytorin as well as Zetia in the medical journals, and letting you know what we find, here.

Subpoenas Issued For Witnesses To Appear At February 2008 U.S. House Committee Hearing On Ketek

Congress Wants To Know When Sanofi-Aventis And The FDA Learned About Fraud Involved With Ketek Study 3014

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

Soon after noon on January 29, 2008 Ed Silverman posted on his Pharmalot blog an article, "House Committee Will Subpoena FDA Over Ketek", which reported this breaking news about the Congressional investigation into Ketek, Sanofi-Aventis, and the FDA:

At its hearing this morning, the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations voted unanimously to approve a motion to subpoena FDA officials and investigators over clinical trial data for the Sanofi-Aventis antibiotic [Ketek], which has been linked to liver failure.

This same Pharmalot post about Ketek provided access to a January 25, 2008 memorandum sent by the committee's chairman, John Dingell, and Bart Stupak, the head of a subcommittee, both from Michigan, which had previewed the actions that would be taken at this January 29 meeting.

More detail came soon thereafter in this CQ Today Midday Update article, "House Energy Panel OKs Subpoenas in FDA Probe", published January 29 online:

The subcommittee is seeking testimony from:

• FDA special agent Douglas Loveland.

• FDA special agent Robert West.

• Robert Ekey, former special agent at the FDA.

• Ann Marie Cisneros, a clinical researcher who was involved in the testing.

The panel also authorized a subpoena to Health and Human Services [(HHS)] Secretary Michael O. Leavitt for records related to FDA Commissioner Andrew C. von Eschenbach’s testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on March 22.

Stupak, who offered the motion, said "the FDA has been less than forthcoming with either witness or document production in connection with our drug safety investigations."

The Michigan Democrat added that the panel requested briefing books and related documents six days after the March hearing, but the agencies refused to provide them, and "no legal authority has been provided to the committee to support this refusal."

And not much later the same day we got reactions to this latest development in the Ketek investigation from a Reuters January 29 article, "US panel OKs subpoenas in Sanofi antibiotic probe", by reporter Lisa Richwine:

FDA spokeswoman Karen Riley said the agency had provided more than 80,000 pages of Ketek information to House investigators and would continue to cooperate with the probe.

"We also have made staff available who have met with the committee, and we have made every effort to be responsive to the committee's requests," she added.

HHS spokeswoman Christina Pearson said the health department had "worked hard to be responsive to congressional requests related to Ketek" for the past two years.

"We will continue to work with the House toward a solution that is responsive but will not compromise investigations or the ability of senior officials to obtain accurate information and frank advice from their staffs," she said.

Sanofi-Aventis spokeswoman Julissa Viana repeated earlier comments saying Aventis was not aware of the fraud in Study 3014 until after it was submitted to the FDA.

"We have critically reviewed the record of the clinical study being reviewed and have identified important lessons learned to improve policies and procedures," she said.

Elsewhere on Capitol Hill, as some may recall, in December 2007 Senator Charles Grassley wrote a letter to the FDA that raised questions about the agency's approval of Ketek in 2004.

We look forward to the meeting of this House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, currently scheduled for February 12, 2008.  According to the January 29 Reuters article, their Ketek investigation will continue in this manner:

The panel wants to question the witnesses about "their knowledge of whether Aventis was aware of substantial data integrity problems in Study 3014 at the time of submission to FDA," Stupak said.

Be assured that we will report out what is learned at this February 12 Congressional hearing about the who-knew-what-and-when as regards this now infamous Ketek Study 3014.

P.S.  According to a February 13, 2008 Bloomberg News article, "White House rejects subpoena", yesterday HHS Secretary Leavitt refused to comply with that subpoena issued by this investigative subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee regarding papers used to prepare FDA Commissioner von Eschenbach for testimony that he had given at a hearing on Sanofi-Aventis' antibiotic Ketek in March 2007.  (2/13/08)

Zetia And Vytorin: Steven Nissen Calls For A "Moratorium" On Their Use Due To Failed Study

Long-Awaited Results Of ENHANCE Study Show Zocor + Zetia (= Vytorin) Does Not Improve Patient Outcomes

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

A January 14, 2008 Bloomberg article, "Merck, Schering's Vytorin No Better Than Generic (Update 2)", reported the long-awaited results of a study concerning Zetia and Vytorin as well as the immediate fall-out: 

Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough Corp. said their combination cholesterol drug Vytorin worked no better than an older, generic medication in reducing the buildup of artery-clogging fat in a key study.

Steven Nissen, head of cardiology at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, immediately called for a "moratorium" on the use of Vytorin and Zetia. Vytorin is a combination of Zetia and simvastatin, the generic medication used in the trial. The two cholesterol drugs generated $1.3 billion in third-quarter sales....

"In the absence of any evidence of a clinical benefit, these drugs should now be used as a last resort," said Nissen, who was not involved in the study, in a telephone interview.

Some basic information about the underlying study and its outcome was set forth in a January 14, 2007 Dow Jones Newswire piece, "Merck: No Significant Difference Between Grps In ENHANCE Trial":

ENHANCE was a surrogate endpoint trial conducted in 720 patients with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

All analyses were conducted in accordance with the original statistical analysis plan. The primary endpoint was the mean change in the intima-media thickness measured at three sites in the carotid arteries (the right and left common carotid, internal carotid and carotid bulb) between patients treated with ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/80 mg versus patients treated with simvastatin 80 mg alone over a two year period.

There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups on the primary endpoint. There was also no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups for each of the components of the primary endpoint, including the common carotid artery. Key secondary imaging endpoints showed no statistical difference between treatment groups.

Schering-Plough issued a press release about the ENHANCE study results -- that was oddly dated "Nov. 19, 2007" when accessed the morning of January 14 -- which announced:

Merck/Schering-Plough has submitted an abstract on the ENHANCE trial for presentation at the American College of Cardiology meeting, which will be held in March 2008, and is awaiting notification of acceptance from the College.

Vytorin is a combination of Zetia (ezetimibe) and simvastatin (brand name: Zocor).  There have been reports that Zetia may cause drug-induced hepatitis and liver failure.  The potential for Zetia to cause liver injury was first raised by Health Canada in February 2005.  This drug-safety issue received renewed attention in December 2007 when an article in The New York Times suggested that Merck and Schering-Plough, in fact, knew about these Zetia side effects but that this information was withheld by the drug companies.

P.S.  In response to the frenzy following the ENHANCE study results being released, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) has stated "There should no be reason for patients to panic", and advises doctors "that major clinical decisions not be made on the basis of the ENHANCE study alone."  This ACC Statement on ENHANCE Trial was issued on January 15, 2008.  (1/16/08)

Where Are The Medical Journal Articles About Problems With Studies On Zetia And Vytorin?

Dr. Blumsohn Shines His Bright Light On This Troubling Situation And Provides A Lengthy List Of Recent Blog Posts About Zetia And Vytorin

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

Over at the Scientific Misconduct Blog, Dr. Aubrey Blumsohn has posted an article, "Ezetimibe - where are our medical journals?", which makes one wonder if Zetia and Vytorin are getting off easy in the medical journal world.

From Dr. Blumsohn's Jaunuary 11, 2008 post on Zetia (ezetimibe):

The huge ethical and scientific problems with the drug Ezetimibe have been discussed widely in the lay press (especially in the New York Times). The problems have been discussed by patients, on the internet and in the blogsphere. However as of today, a search of our key medical journals reveals no hint of any ethical discussion. No discussion of the principles of good science. Not even a worthy news report. Nothing at all.

  • The British medical Journal : No discussion
  • The Lancet: On 24 November 2007 in the midst of the saga, the Lancet published a review entitled "The safety of statins in clinical practice" Jane Armitage, Vol. 370, Issue 9601 Pages 1781-1790. There was no relevant discussion or associated editorial in that issue or in any subsequent issue.
  • NEJM: No discussion
  • JAMA: No discussion

Dr. Blumsohn then contrasts this "silence" in the medical journals to the discussion of these problems with Zetia and Vytorin duting the last few months in articles by bloggers who write regularly about medical and pharmaceutical topics.  His list of 35 blog posts includes our earlier article, "Cholesterol Drug Zetia May Cause Serious Liver Injury Including Hepatitis And Liver Failure".

And to Dr. Blumsohn's list of recent blog articles about this troubling situation we can add "Behind The Curtain: That Secret Vytorin Panel", which was posted by Ed Silverman at his Pharmalot blog on January 11.

We close with this observation by Dr. Blumsohn:

One wonders how long our key medical journals will retain any credibility as honest impartial portals for discussion of science and the principles of good medicine.

Of course, we will continue to watch for developments concerning Zetia and Vytorin.

Senator Grassley's December 2007 Letter To FDA Questions Agency's Approval Of Ketek

Sanofi-Aventis Antibiotic Has Been Subject Of Controversy Since Reports of Liver Damage Surfaced In Early 2006

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

The safety concerns about Ketek (telithromycin) began in early 2006 after Health Canada and the European Union's European Medicines Agency (EMEA) issued alerts based on the online "early" release of an article about Ketek that would later be published in the March 21, 2006 edition of the Annals of Internal Medicine.  This article reported three cases in a North Carolina hospital where there was liver failure associated with Ketek use.

In May 2006 Senator Charles Grassley (R-Ill.) as well as Congressmen Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Henry Waxman (D-Calf.) asked the FDA for some explanation about the agency's decision to approve the antibiotic Ketek in 2004.  This scrutiny from Capitol Hill followed in the wake of a May 1, 2006 investigative piece in The Wall Street Journal about how the FDA approved Ketek despite knowing about some problems with a key study -- known as trial 3014 -- which was submitted to the FDA by Ketek's manufacturer, Sanofi-Aventis (SNY).

Finally, in October 2007 the FDA posted on its web site a copy of an 11-page "Warning Letter" to Sanofi-Aventis about problems with Ketek Study 3014.

Most recently, on December 19, 2007 Senator Grassley, ranking member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, sent a 22-page letter to FDA commissioner Andrew C. von Eschenbach, M.D., regarding the Committee's ongoing investigation of Ketek.

In his letter Grassley reports what has been learned over the past 16 months, during which time the Committee's staff reviewed documents and information obtained from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the FDA, FDA advisory committee members, and the drug company Sanofi-Aventis.  The primary focus of Grassley's letter is the FDA's review of Sanofi-Aventis' Study 3014, and the FDA’s unprecedented reliance on adverse-events data collected in foreign countries for evidence of Ketek’s safety when approving this antibiotic for sale in the U.S.

Also in his December 19 letter to the FDA Commissioner Grassley presents the Committee's findings as regards some of the inspections and investigations conducted by FDA’s Division of Scientific Investigations (DSI) and Office of Criminal Investigations (OCI) concerning alleged improprieties and misconduct associated with Study 3014.

As regards the FDA's approval of Ketek on April 1, 2004, from the first few pages of this December 2007 letter from Senator Grassley we learn the following:

Current and former FDA employees alleged that FDA relied solely on foreign postmarketing adverse event reports as evidence of Ketek’s safety for marketing when the Agency could no longer rely on the large safety study, Study 3014. These employees questioned whether or not the use of such data as the primary basis for the Agency’s safety assessment of Ketek met the standards for approval of the drug....

FDA appears to have relied primarily on foreign post-marketing safety data to
assess the safety of Ketek as a new antibiotic for marketing. Based on interviews with current and former FDA staff, heavy reliance on foreign post-marketing safety data in this context is unprecedented. A week before Ketek was approved, FDA’s Division of Scientific Investigations concluded that the data from a large clinical trial were unreliable. The study was conducted to evaluate specific adverse events associated with Ketek. In place of the large clinical trial, the FDA based its assessment of the safety of Ketek on foreign post-marketing adverse event reports, despite inherent limitations with that data, including underreporting and reporting bias. When asked by Committee Staff, FDA managers and reviewers could not identify any other case where FDA relied on foreign postmarketing data as the primary basis of its safety assessment for the approval of a new antibiotic.

As the stated purpose of this December 19 letter to Dr. von Eschenbach was not only to report the Committee's findings but, also, to "request your comments and responses regarding these findings and some of the other allegations and concerns that have been brought to the Committee’s attention", we will likely be reporting more about Ketek and Study 3014 in the months to come.

Case Report Shows How Diagnosis Of Ketek-Induced Liver Injury Is Made By Doctors

Abnormal Liver Function Tests In Man With No Hepatotoxicity Risk Factors After Taking Ketek For Three Days Indicates Drug Side Effect

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

As we have reported previously, use of the antibiotic Ketek appears to significantly increase one's risk of developing liver damage.

A medical journal Case Report article by Scott Bolesta and Brian P. Roslund, "Elevated hepatic transaminases associated with telithromycin therapy: A case report and literature review", provides insight as to how a case of liver damage can be attributed to the patient's use of Ketek (telithromycin).  This article was published in the American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (Vol. 65, Issue 1, 2008).

The clinical setting is that a 44-year-old man with no risk factors for hepatotoxicity nor any other significant past medical history presented at the emergency room complaining of high fever, chills, headache, neck stiffness, and back pain for the past six days.  It is learned that five days before the onset of these symptoms (or the ER visit, it is a bit unclear) he had been prescribed Ketek 800 mg daily for a suspected upper respiratory tract infection.  The patient reported, however, that he had stopped taking the Ketek after just three days use because of these symptoms.  Further, the patient reported that he was not taking any other prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) medication, and he denied any recent use of alcohol or illegal drugs.

Abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) and other lab tests led his doctors to the conclusion that some of his persistent symptoms were, in fact, being caused by the medication which he had been prescribed for his upper respiratory tract infection.

From the Abstract for this Case Report article we get these details:

  • On admission, the patient’s laboratory tests revealed an aspartate transaminase (AST) concentration of 68 units/L, an alanine transaminase (ALT) value of 155 units/L, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 40 mm/hr.
  • His urine culture was negative, and serology tests later revealed no evidence of hepatitis A, B, or C.
  • On hospital day 2, the patient’s AST and ALT concentrations had decreased to 50 and 110 units/L, respectively.
  • By day 3... his AST and ALT values had further decreased to 41 and 105 units/L, respectively.

Given this improvement in the liver function tests (LFTs) as time passed since the patient's last use of Ketek use, his doctors diagnosed a Ketek side effect, in the form of mild hepatotoxicity, on top of the upper respiratory tract infection for which the Ketek had been prescribed.

If there were other prescription drugs, OTC medications, or even dietary supplements being used by this patient, the diagnosis of Ketek-induced toxicity would have likely been more difficult to ascertain.

Cholesterol Drug Zetia May Cause Serious Liver Injury Including Hepatitis And Liver Failure

Health Canada First Raised This Zetia Safety Issue In February 2005; News Reporter Discovers In December 2007 That Information Known By Merck and Schering-Plough About These Zetia Side Effects May Have Been Withheld

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

Back on February 1, 2005 Health Canada posted on its web site a so-called "Dear Doctor" letter about Zetia (ezetimibe) -- called Ezetrol in Canada -- from Merck Frosst / Schering Pharmaceuticals that was intended to draw attention to some serious side effects associated with Zetia.  That 2005 Dear Doctor letter included the following:

The Warnings, Precautions, and Adverse Events sections are being updated to reflect the occurrence of the following adverse events in patients taking Ezetrol® (ezetimibe) alone or in combination with a statin:

  • myalgia;
  • rhabdomyolysis;
  • hepatitis;
  • acute pancreatitis;
  • thrombocytopenia; and
  • suspected interaction between Ezetrol® (ezetimibe) and warfarin 

In the U.S., however, Merck and Schering-Plough -- the drug companies responsible for Zetia, here -- chose not to send any corresponding Dear Doctor letter to American health care professionals, nor did the FDA mandate that they do so.

Returning to this 2005 Dear Doctor letter about Zetia, here is what was said about liver injuries to patients using Zetia and a statin drug (such as Zocor, Lipitor, Crestor, Lescol, Mevacor, or Pravachol):

Adverse hepatic events:

Elevations of liver transaminases and cases of hepatitis have been reported in patients treated with [Zetia]. Liver function monitoring is recommended when therapy with [Zetia] is initiated in patients treated or about to begin treatment with a statin.

Health care professionals should be aware that the use of [Zetia] in combination with a statin is contraindicated in patients with active liver disease or unexplained persistent elevations of liver transaminases.

In the two years since this 2005 Dear Doctor letter about Zetia was sent by the Merck and Schering group in Canada there have been some case reports of serious liver injury in patients using Zetia and statins -- but for the most part Zetia-induced liver injury had been off-the-radar for most drug safety observers. 

Now we have some idea about why, perhaps, Zetia-induced liver injury side effects were not more widely known.

In a December 21, 2007 article, "Data About Zetia Risks Was Not Fully Revealed", New York Times (NYT) reporter Alex Berenson broke the story that Merck and Schering-Plough had conducted several studies of Zetia which, in fact, raised the possibility that Zetia can cause liver damage when used long-term with other statins -- but these drug companies decided not to publish the results of those Zetia studies.

In preparing for his December 2007 Zetia article, the Times' reporter Alex Berenson spoke to a drug company representative and some medical doctors about this reporter's discovery of unpublished research about Zetia and liver-related side effects. 

We'll start with comments from two doctors who spoke with Mr. Berenson about this emerging drug safety issue:

“You don’t want to have data missing,” said Dr. Bruce Psaty, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at the University of Washington. “When there have been adverse effects, when the benefits don’t look impressive, those are the trials that historically don’t make it to press.”...

“We keep telling people we want to practice evidence-based medicine, and what we keep finding out is that much of the evidence is obscured,” said Dr. Harlan Krumholz, a cardiologist at Yale, when told about the previously undisclosed studies. “There is important evidence, but it’s not in public view. It’s hidden from investigators.”

On the other side of things, the Schering-Plough representative had this to say :

A Schering executive, when asked by a reporter about the unpublished [Zetia] studies, confirmed their existence. But the executive, Dr. Robert J. Spiegel, said the companies had not considered the [Zetia] studies scientifically important enough to publish their findings. Some may eventually be published, he said.

"We’re pretty comfortable that people don’t have trouble tolerating Zetia,” said Dr. Spiegel, the chief medical officer of the Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, N.J.  (Emphasis added.)

In his December 2007 NYT article Mr. Berenson provides some reasons, however, why doctors and patients may not want to go along with this "reassurance" from Schering's Dr. Spiegel:

Most of the studies about Zetia in which Merck and Schering have published the results covered periods of only 12 weeks — not enough time for liver problems to develop in most patients....

But the F.D.A.’s documents show that Merck and Schering conducted several other long-term trials of Zetia without releasing their findings.

Together those studies cover several thousand patients who took Zetia along with statins for one to two years. The statins include Lipitor and Crestor, as well as Zocor, which is usually prescribed generically as simvastatin and is the statin used in the Vytorin pill....

The companies’ own published studies have generally played down the risk of liver problems. But Dr. Mark Stolk, a gastroenterologist in the Netherlands, last year reported two cases of patients who had developed hepatitis, a liver disease, after taking Zetia alongside Lipitor. One of the patients has since died, Dr. Stolk said in an interview last month. While Zetia is safe for most patients, doctors should carefully monitor patients for liver damage, he said.

“I think other cases will emerge,” he said.

What does the FDA have to say about this news reporter's discovery of unpublished studies suggesting that Zetia can cause serious liver injury when taken with statins?  Mr. Berenson tells us: "The agency did not respond to requests for comment."

To be sure, we will be reporting further developments as more is learned about the safety of Zetia -- one way or the other.

P.S.  Given how NYT reporter Alex Berenson discovered that Merck and Schering-Plough failed to publish some studies about Zetia and liver damage, Ed Silverman timely posted "How To Find Documents On The FDA Site" on his Pharmalot blog:

This cheat sheet should help you find briefing documents - the reams of supporting paperwork submitted by a drugmaker when seeking FDA approval for its med. It was compiled by a professor and students at the Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine’s School of Pharmacy and recently published in the letters section of The Annals of Pharmacotherapy.

Thanks Ed for this insight about how emerging drug-safety issues (like the NYT Zetia story) can be found and exposed.  (12/21/07)

P.S.   Dr. Aubrey Blumsohn, over at the Scientific Misconduct Blog, gives us his strongly worded opinion about the position asserted by Schering's medical director in the NY Times story about Zetia and Vytorin, which I have bolded above. 

In his post, "More problems with Ezetimibe (Zetia, Vytorin): Let there be light", Dr. Blumsohn writes:

... Dr. Spiegel, it's not your decision. When patients might die it's always "scientifically important".

In addition, Dr. Blumsohn provides links to some other articles about this emerging Zetia study data controversy.  (12/23/07)

New Information From FDA On Alleged Problems With Ketek Safety Study 3014

October 2007 FDA Letter Says Aventis Did Not Follow Regulations And Statutory Requirements; Company Contends Study Conducted In Good Faith

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

On October 24, 2007 the FDA posted on its web site a copy of an 11-page "Warning Letter" to Sanofi-Aventis (SNY) about problems with Ketek Study 3014.

In her October 25, 2007 Wall Street Journal article, "FDA Says Aventis Failed To Act on Ketek Drug Fears", Anna Wilde Mathews provided this summary the FDA's Ketek letter:

In yesterday's letter, the FDA said visits from an Aventis contractor and the drug maker's own audits documented "serious protocol violations and regulatory noncompliance by multiple clinical investigators." The agency said it was "unable to find evidence" that the company either fixed the problems or threw the problematic doctors out of the study and told the FDA. The FDA also faulted Aventis for failing to make sure the study was properly conducted and for allowing unqualified investigators to participate in the trial.

According to an October 25, 2007 story, "Sanofi slammed by FDA over failure to act on Ketek fraud", by Kristy Barnes that was posted on DrugResearcher.com:

[Study 3014 of Ketek (telithromycin) was] carried out between 2001 and 2002 after the FDA said that it needed more safety information on Ketek following fears that it could cause liver problems. The studies were carried out by Pharmaceutical Products Development (PPD) on behalf of Aventis, prior to its merger with Sanofi-Synthelabo.

In July 2002, Aventis submitted the results of study 3014 to the FDA. Subsequent data validation inspections by the agency of several clinical investigators participating in the study raised red flags and the FDA requested in January 2003 that Aventis provide information on its sponsor monitoring and auditing of clinical investigator sites for the trial.

Aventis subsequently provided this information to the FDA and following a lengthy investigation, the agency has now concluded that: "Aventis did not adhere to the applicable statutory requirements and FDA regulations governing the conduct of clinical investigations".

At least two Sanofi-Aventis representatives have disputed the FDA's suggestion that Aventis acted improperly as regards its Study 3014 concerning the safety of Ketek.

As reported by Kim Dixon in "U.S. FDA cites Sanofi for shoddy study oversight", published online by Reuters October 24, 2007:

Sanofi-Aventis spokeswoman Emmy Tsui said the company intends to provide a detailed response to the letter.

She said the study was conducted in good faith, but has been the subject of much discussion. Sanofi has acknowledged that "various deviations occurred, including investigator fraud, and FDA did not rely upon this study in approving Ketek," she added.

And returning to the October 2007 Ketek story by Kristy Barnes on DrugResearcher.com:

Salah Mayhaoui, head of product communications for Sanofi-Aventis told DrugResearcher.com that: "Study 3014 was the first large "real world" study of an antibiotic and Aventis conducted this study in good faith."

"However, non-conformance in the form of deviations [from protocol] and other issues occurred, including clinical investigator fraud."

Mayhaoui said that the firm would provide a "detailed response" to the FDA's letter in the coming days. As part of this response we will "highlight some of the steps Aventis took to prevent the problems that occurred in 3014."

He said that at this point he did not know the next course of action that the FDA may take in regard to this matter. "I think they will review our arguments and then it is up to them to decide what happens next."

We will watch for further developments regarding this controversial clinical study of Ketek and, more generally, for new reports of liver damage and liver failure associated with the use of this particular antibiotic.

My Photo

RSS Feed

  • FeedBurner

Email Delivery

Let Us Know


Sponsored By

Case Review

Featured On

Bookmarking

  • Add to Technorati Favorites
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Poll: Federal Preemption -- Good or Bad Policy?

Resources

  • Drug Interaction Checker
    Program alerts patients to some drug-drug interaction possibilities when taking two or more prescription drugs.
  • FDA MedWatch
    MedWatch is the U.S. FDA site for safety information on prescription drugs and other medical products.
  • Health Canada MedEffect
    Health Canada's MedEffect site provides drug product safety announcements and other information for patients.
  • Medication Errors Reporting Program (MERP)
    Submit a confidential report to national voluntary program.
  • NIH MedlinePlus
    MedlinePlus will direct you to information that will help answer health questions.
  • Patient Medical Records Copying Cost Statutes
    State statutes that control what amount can be charged when patient requests their own medical records in U.S.
  • PDRhealth.com
    Based on most trusted database of prescription drug information, Physicians’ Desk Reference.
  • PharmedOut
    Intended to help prescribers identify and counter inappropriate pharmaceutical promotion practices.

Sites to See

Search Engine

  • Google

    WWW
    www.drug-injury.com

Affiliations

  • BlogBurst.com

Blog Archives

Common Feed

  • FeedBurner

Custom Feeds

  • Add Drug Injury Watch to Newsburst from CNET News.com

  • Add to My AOL

  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online

  • Add to Google

  • Subscribe in Bloglines

HitTail.com

Disclaimer


  • DRUG INJURY WATCH is for general information purposes only, and should not be regarded as medical advice or legal advice.... (For more, please see the About page.)

See You Again